Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Public Health Rep ; 136(6): 663-670, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1390406

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic prompted widespread closures of primary and secondary schools. Routine testing of asymptomatic students and staff members, as part of a comprehensive mitigation program, can help schools open safely. "Pooling in a pod" is a public health surveillance strategy whereby testing cohorts (pods) are based on social relationships and physical proximity. Pooled testing provides a single laboratory test result for the entire pod, rather than a separate result for each person in the pod. During the 2020-2021 school year, an independent preschool-grade 12 school in Washington, DC, used pooling in a pod for weekly on-site point-of-care testing of all staff members and students. Staff members and older students self-collected anterior nares samples, and trained staff members collected samples from younger students. Overall, 12 885 samples were tested in 1737 pools for 863 students and 264 staff members from November 30, 2020, through April 30, 2021. The average pool size was 7.4 people. The average time from sample collection to pool test result was 40 minutes. The direct testing cost per person per week was $24.24, including swabs. During the study period, 4 surveillance test pools received positive test results for COVID-19. A post-launch survey found most parents (90.3%), students (93.4%), and staff members (98.8%) were willing to participate in pooled testing with confirmatory tests for pool members who received a positive test result. The proportion of students in remote learning decreased by 62.2% for students in grades 6-12 (P < .001) and by 92.4% for students in preschool to grade 5 after program initiation (P < .001). Pooling in a pod is a feasible, cost-effective surveillance strategy that may facilitate safe, sustainable, in-person schooling during a pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Schools/organization & administration , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Pandemics , Public Health Surveillance/methods , SARS-CoV-2 , Schools/standards , Time Factors , United States/epidemiology
2.
Sch Psychol ; 36(5): 398-409, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1320219

ABSTRACT

School based health centers (SBHCs) are often at the front line of medical and mental health services for students in the schools they serve. Citywide school closures in New York City in March 2020 and ongoing social distancing procedures resulted in significant changes in SBHC services as well as access to these services. Furthermore, the combination of COVID-19 related stressors and the increased likelihood of adverse childhood events experienced by urban youth creates conditions for the exacerbation of mental health concerns among youth in metropolitan areas. The following article will explore the role of SBHCs as community agents focused on prevention and reduction of mental health concerns prior and during the current pandemic, as well as existing health disparities experienced by urban youth populations. The authors will also discuss research examining mental health concerns already present in global populations affected by COVID-19 as it may foreshadow the challenges to be faced by U.S. urban youth. Lastly, the authors describe recommendations, practice implications, and opportunities for preventative strategies and therapeutic interventions in school based health settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).


Subject(s)
Adverse Childhood Experiences , Behavioral Symptoms/therapy , COVID-19 , Community Health Centers , Physical Distancing , School Health Services , Schools , Adolescent , Behavioral Symptoms/prevention & control , Child , Community Health Centers/organization & administration , Community Health Centers/standards , Healthcare Disparities , Humans , New York City , School Health Services/organization & administration , School Health Services/standards , School Mental Health Services/organization & administration , School Mental Health Services/standards , Schools/organization & administration , Schools/standards , Urban Population
4.
Med Sci Monit ; 27: e929280, 2021 Apr 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1171226

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND In addition to sociodemographic and COVID-19- related factors, the needs of school support, including material, psychological and information support, have seldom been discussed as factors influencing anxiety and depression among college students during the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this cross-sectional study, 3351 college students from China were surveyed through questionnaires about their sociodemographic and COVID-19 characteristics, the needs of school support, and their experiences with anxiety and depression. RESULTS Anxiety and depression were reported by 6.88% and 10.50% of students, respectively. Married, higher education, non-medical, and urban students had significantly higher risks of anxiety or depression. Additionally, symptoms such as cough and fever, especially when following a possible contact with suspected individuals, quarantine history of a personal contact, going out 1-3 times a week, not wearing a mask, and spending 2-3 hours browsing COVID-19-related information were significantly associated with the occurrence of anxiety or depression. Those who used methods to regulate their emotional state, used a psychological hotline, and who had visited a psychiatrist showed higher anxiety or depression. Those who used online curricula and books, used preventive methods for COVID-19, and who had real-time information about the epidemic situation of the school showed lower anxiety and depression. CONCLUSIONS In addition to sociodemographic and COVID-19-related aspects, students' needs for psychological assistance and information from schools were also associated with anxiety and depression among college students.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Depression/epidemiology , Schools/organization & administration , Students/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Anxiety/prevention & control , Anxiety/psychology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , China/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control/standards , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/prevention & control , Depression/psychology , Female , Financial Support , Health Education/organization & administration , Health Education/statistics & numerical data , Hotlines/organization & administration , Hotlines/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Information Dissemination , Male , Mental Health , Pandemics/prevention & control , Prevalence , Psychosocial Support Systems , Schools/economics , Schools/standards , Socioeconomic Factors , Students/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
5.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 27(4): 1229-1231, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1147201

ABSTRACT

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 can persist on surfaces, suggesting possible surface-mediated transmission of this pathogen. We found that fomites might be a substantial source of transmission risk, particularly in schools and child daycares. Combining surface cleaning and decontamination with mask wearing can help mitigate this risk.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Fomites/virology , Infection Control , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Aged , Basic Reproduction Number , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19/virology , Child , Child Day Care Centers/standards , Decontamination/methods , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Hand Disinfection/methods , Humans , Infection Control/instrumentation , Infection Control/methods , Masks , Nursing Homes/standards , Schools/standards , United States/epidemiology
6.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 6264, 2021 03 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1139754

ABSTRACT

Many educational institutions have partially or fully closed all operations to cope with the challenges of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. In this paper, we explore strategies that such institutions can adopt to conduct safe reopening and resume operations during the pandemic. The research is motivated by the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's (UIUC's) SHIELD program, which is a set of policies and strategies, including rapid saliva-based COVID-19 screening, for ensuring safety of students, faculty and staff to conduct in-person operations, at least partially. Specifically, we study how rapid bulk testing, contact tracing and preventative measures such as mask wearing, sanitization, and enforcement of social distancing can allow institutions to manage the epidemic spread. This work combines the power of analytical epidemic modeling, data analysis and agent-based simulations to derive policy insights. We develop an analytical model that takes into account the asymptomatic transmission of COVID-19, the effect of isolation via testing (both in bulk and through contact tracing) and the rate of contacts among people within and outside the institution. Next, we use data from the UIUC SHIELD program and 85 other universities to estimate parameters that describe the analytical model. Using the estimated parameters, we finally conduct agent-based simulations with various model parameters to evaluate testing and reopening strategies. The parameter estimates from UIUC and other universities show similar trends. For example, infection rates at various institutions grow rapidly in certain months and this growth correlates positively with infection rates in counties where the universities are located. Infection rates are also shown to be negatively correlated with testing rates at the institutions. Through agent-based simulations, we demonstrate that the key to designing an effective reopening strategy is a combination of rapid bulk testing and effective preventative measures such as mask wearing and social distancing. Multiple other factors help to reduce infection load, such as efficient contact tracing, reduced delay between testing and result revelation, tests with less false negatives and targeted testing of high-risk class among others. This paper contributes to the nascent literature on combating the COVID-19 pandemic and is especially relevant for educational institutions and similarly large organizations. We contribute by providing an analytical model that can be used to estimate key parameters from data, which in turn can be used to simulate the effect of different strategies for reopening. We quantify the relative effect of different strategies such as bulk testing, contact tracing, reduced infectivity and contact rates in the context of educational institutions. Specifically, we show that for the estimated average base infectivity of 0.025 ([Formula: see text]), a daily number of tests to population ratio T/N of 0.2, i.e., once a week testing for all individuals, is a good indicative threshold. However, this test to population ratio is sensitive to external infectivities, internal and external mobilities, delay in getting results after testing, and measures related to mask wearing and sanitization, which affect the base infection rate.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Pandemics/prevention & control , Schools/standards , Universities/standards , Asymptomatic Diseases , Computer Simulation , Contact Tracing/methods , Humans , Saliva/virology
8.
Work ; 68(1): 69-75, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1058395

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The school is one of the most critical social, educational, and training institutions and the main pillar of education in society. Education and, consequently, educational environments have the highest effect on the mentality, development, growth, welfare, concentration, performance, and learning efficiency of students. OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to examine the effects of environmental ergonomics on the learning and cognition of pre-school students during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The study was carried out as a review article using some keywords, namely "children", "learning", "pre-school", "COVID-19", "ergonomics", and "environmental factors". Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct and Web of Science were searched to find related articles. RESULTS: Factors like color, form, and layout of classrooms, lighting and ventilation, interior decoration, and educational equipment are effective in creating interest and motivation for students to learn. CONCLUSIONS: A review of these articles showed that the presence of ergonomics in educational spaces for children increases the quality of learning and reduces stress and anxiety, and by observing health protocols, a healthy and safe environment can be provided for students.


Subject(s)
Ergonomics/standards , Schools/standards , Students/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/prevention & control , Ergonomics/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Schools/organization & administration , Schools/statistics & numerical data
9.
Health Place ; 64: 102398, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1023585

ABSTRACT

Schools have closed worldwide as part of measures to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission but are beginning to reopen in some countries. Various measures are being pursued to minimise transmission but existing guidance has not developed a comprehensive framework or theory of change. We present a framework informed by the occupational health hierarchy of control and a theory of change informed by realist approaches. We present measures focused on elimination, substitution, engineering, administration, education and personal protective equipment. We theorise that such measures offer a means of disrupting SARS-CoV-2 transmission via routes involving fomites, faeco-oral routes, droplets and aerosols.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Evidence-Based Practice , Infection Control/standards , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Schools/standards , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Schools/organization & administration
10.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 27(3): 229-232, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1005742

ABSTRACT

Reopening in-person education in public schools during the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic requires careful risk-benefit analysis, with no current established metrics. Equity concerns in urban public schools such as decreased enrollment among largely Black and Latinx prekindergarten and special needs public school students already disproportionately impacted by the pandemic itself have added urgency to Chicago Department of Public Health's analysis of COVID-19 transmission. Close tracking within a large school system revealed a lower attack rate for students and staff participating in in-person learning than for the community overall. By combining local data from a large urban private school system with national and international data on maintaining in-person learning during COVID-19 surges, Chicago believes in-person public education poses a low risk of transmission when the operational burden imposed by the second wave has subsided.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/transmission , Disease Transmission, Infectious/statistics & numerical data , Education/standards , Guidelines as Topic , Schools/statistics & numerical data , Schools/standards , Students/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Chicago/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cities/epidemiology , Cities/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Pandemics , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Assessment/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL